Asyndeton Definition and Examples

Asyndeton is a  rhetorical term for a writing style that omits conjunctions between words, phrases, or clauses. Adjective: asyndetic. The opposite of asyndeton is  polysyndeton. According to Edward Corbett and Robert Connors, The principal effect of asyndeton is to produce a hurried rhythm in the sentence (Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student, 1999). In his study of Shakespeares style, Russ McDonald argues that the figure of asyndeton works by means of juxtaposition rather than coupling, thereby depriving the auditor of clear logical relations (Shakespeares Late Style, 2010). Examples and Observations He was a bag of bones, a floppy doll, a broken stick, a maniac.(Jack Kerouac, On the Road, 1957)Joona walks through the Christmas market in Bollnà ¤s Square. Fires are burning, horses are snorting, chestnuts are roasting. Children race through a stone maze, others drink hot chocolate.(Lars Kepler, The Hypnotist. Trans. by Ann Long. Picador, 2011)Speed up the film, Montag, quick. Click, Pic, Look, Eye, Now, Flick, Here, There, Swift, Pace, Up, Down, In, Out, Why, How, Who, What, Where, Eh? Uh! Bang! Smack! Wallop, Bing, Bong, Boom!(Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451, 1953)She was young, she was pure, she was new, she was nice,She was fair, she was sweet seventeen.He was old, he was vile, and no stranger to vice,He was base, he was bad, he was mean.He had slyly inveigled her up to his flatTo view his collection of stamps.(Flanders and Swann, Have Some Madeira, MDear)Why, theyve got ten volumes on suicide alone. Suicide by race, by color, by occupation, by sex, by seasons of the year, by tim e of day. Suicide, how committed: by poisons, by firearms, by drowning, by leaps. Suicide by poison, subdivided by types of poison, such as corrosive, irritant, systemic, gaseous, narcotic, alkaloid, protein, and so forth. Suicide by leaps, subdivided by leaps from high places, under the wheels of trains, under the wheels of trucks, under the feet of horses, from steamboats. But Mr. Norton, of all the cases on record, theres not one single case of suicide by leap from the rear end of a moving train.(Edward G. Robinson as insurance agent Barton Keyes in Double Indemnity, 1944)It is a northern country; they have cold weather, they have cold hearts.Cold; tempest; wild beasts in the forest. It is a hard life. Their houses are built of logs, dark and smoky within. There will be a crude icon of the virgin behind a guttering candle, the leg of a pig hung up to cure, a string of drying mushrooms. A bed, a stool, a table. Harsh, brief, poor lives.(Angela Carter, The Werewolf. The Bloody Cham ber and Other Stories, 1979)I have found the warm caves in the woods,filled them with skillets, carvings, shelves,closets, silks, innumerable goods(Anne Sexton, Her Kind)In some ways, he was this town at its best--strong, hard-driving, working feverishly, pushing, building, driven by ambitions so big they seemed Texas-boastful.(Mike Royko, A Tribute)Anyway, like I was saying, shrimp is the fruit of the sea. You can barbecue it, boil it, broil it, bake it, saute it. Deys uh, shrimp-kabobs, shrimp creole, shrimp gumbo. Pan fried, deep fried, stir-fried. Theres pineapple shrimp, lemon shrimp, coconut shrimp, pepper shrimp, shrimp soup, shrimp stew, shrimp salad, shrimp and potatoes, shrimp burger, shrimp sandwich. That--thats about it.(Bubba in Forrest Gump, 1994)Fog everywhere. Fog up the river, where it flows among green aits and meadows; fog down the river, where it rolls deified among the tiers of shipping and the waterside pollutions of a great (and dirty) city. Fog on the Essex m arshes, fog on the Kentish heights. Fog creeping into the cabooses of collier-brigs; fog lying out on the yards and hovering in the rigging of great ships; fog drooping on the gunwales of barges and small boats. Fog in the eyes and throats of ancient Greenwich pensioners, wheezing by the firesides of their wards; fog in the stem and bowl of the afternoon pipe of the wrathful skipper, down in his close cabin; fog cruelly pinching the toes and fingers of his shivering little prentice boy on deck. Chance people on the bridges peeping over the parapets into a nether sky of fog, with fog all round them, as if they were up in a balloon and hanging in the misty clouds.(Charles Dickens, Bleak House, 1852-1853) Functions of Asyndeton When [asyndeton] is used in a series of words, phrases, or clauses, it suggests the series is somehow incomplete, that there is more the writer could have included (Rice 217). To put it somewhat differently: in a conventional series, writers place an and before the final item. That and signals the end of the series: Here it is folks--the last item. Omit that conjunction and you create the impression that the series could continue. . . Asyndeton can also create ironic juxtapositions that invite readers into collaborative relationships with writers: because there are no explicit connections between phrases and clauses, readers must supply them to reconstruct the writers intent. . . Asyndeton can also quicken the pace of prose, especially when it is used between clauses and sentences.(Chris Holcomb and M. Jimmie Killingsworth, Performing Prose: The Study and Practice of Style in Composition. SIU Press, 2010) EtymologyFrom the Greek, unconnected Pronunciation: ah-SIN-di-ton

Explanation and Examples of Wo and Da in German

One of the things that can make translating other languages difficult for many is that the rules of grammar change with each language. Knowing the correct word order can be difficult if you dont understand the rules o the language youre learning. In English, adverbs usually come after prepositions but in German, it is the opposite. The adverbs wo and da coupled with prepositions become helpful tools in day-to-day German conversation. By themselves, wo means where and da means there, but by adding prepositions, it changes their whole meaning. Its important that people learning German understand how prepositions can alter these common words if they want to be understood. Wo Preposition Wo preposition is useful when asking questions for clarification such as in Worauf wartet er? (What is he waiting for?) Notice that the translation for worauf is for what—not a literal translation. Thats because many of the wo prepositions replace the colloquial, but incorrect German word combination preposition was. (incorrect - Fà ¼r was ist das?, correct - Wofà ¼r ist das?) Since the incorrect German version of preposition was most closely resembles the English translation, English speakers find it difficult to overcome this natural tendency of question formation. Thats why it is important that English-speaking students of German learn early on to incorporate the use of ​wo-words in their conversation. Da Preposition Similarly, the da preposition combinations cannot always be translated literally. It all depends on context. Sometimes da will keep its there meaning if it refers to a location. At other times the word means something closer to the English that. Understanding this difference is important for students of German who want to make sure their speech is grammatically correct even if their meaning is still understood. For example: Was kommt daraus? (What is coming out from there?) Was konntest du daraus feststellen? (What were you able to determine from that?) Da- words are very useful so as to not sound redundant. For example, if someone were to ask you Bist du mit diesem Zeitplan einverstanden? The shorter response would be Ich bin damit einverstanden, instead of reiterating the noun. Examples of Wo and Da Use Below you will find a list of some common wo- and da- compounds. Take note that if the preposition starts with a vowel then it will be preceded by an –r- when combining it with either wo or da. ( unter - darunter) bei by - wobei – dabeidurch through - wodurch – dadurchfà ¼r for - wofà ¼r – dafà ¼rgegen against - wogegen - dagegenher (prefix) coming from - woher – daherhin (prefix) going to - wohin – dahinmit with - womit – damitnach after - wonach – danachan on, at, to - woran – daranauf on - worauf – daraufaus out of, from - woraus – darausin in - worin – darinà ¼ber over, above - worà ¼ber – darà ¼berunter under, underneath - worunter – daruntervon from - wovon – davonvor before, in front of - wovor – davorzu to, at - wozu – dazu

Results of Drug Testing on Rats - 3306 Words

Materials and Methods 2.1 Animal studies 2.1.1 Materials Ketamine, xylazine, carprofen, vetadine, lacrilube, terramycin, sodium lactate, penicillin G sodium, heparin sodium, pentobarbital and supramid wire were obtained from Provet (Auckland, NZ). Ethanol was obtained from PureScience (Wellington, NZ). Cocaine-HCl (BDG Synthesis, Wellington, NZ) was dissolved in physiological saline (0.9%) containing heparin sodium (3 U/mL) and made up to a solution of 1.65 g/L (rats were considered to average 330 g). Each intravenous infusion was 0.1 mL and delivered over a period of 12 s (0.5 mg/kg/infusion). For intraperitoneal injections, cocaine-HCl was dissolved in physiological saline to a concentration of 2 mg/mL. Surgery equipment: silastic and tygon tubing were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Auckland, NZ), silicon, cotton buds and Bostik superglue were obtained from the Warehouse (Wellington, NZ), while gauze swabs were purchased from Global Science (Auckland, NZ). Large screws (CS00395) were obtained from Coastal Fasteners (Wellington, NZ) and small screws (MCPF40210) from Eyeline Optical (Wellington, NZ). The Ostron powder and liquid were obtained from Henry Schein Shalfoon (Auckland, NZ). Syringes and needles were acquired from Becton Dickinson (Auckland, NZ) while the minisart filters (0.2  µm) were from MicroNZ. 2.1.2 Subjects Male B6-SJL mice were obtained from the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research (Wellington, NZ) for tail withdrawal assays while male Sprague-DawleyShow MoreRelatedEssay on Animal Testing1383 Words   |  6 PagesBehavior Animal testing is not a problem in today’s society because it is beneficial to humans. It seems unethical to put animals through such pain and torture, but if we stopped it completely there would be a large amount of human lives lost. How could this be? The further advancements in medical and technological science is inevitable. Therefore, if the testing must be done to learn more about the brain and body, which species (animals or man) seems expendable for such testing. The real questionRead MoreMedical Testing on Animals is Considered Animal Cruelty Essay1020 Words   |  5 PagesDuring medical testing, less than 2% of human illnesses are seen in animals, therefor medical testing on animals is cruel and pointless. Medical testing on animals should be illegal because products that pass animal tests end up harming or killing humans about 61% of the time. Medical testing on animals is considered animal cruelty and is unnecessary. Many animals are used in scientific and medical research. They often undergo cruel methods of testing and suffer greatly as a result. (Animal Experimentation:Read MoreThe Scientific Understanding Of Animals Essay1696 Words   |  7 Pagesof anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Ibn Zuhr a physician from the twelfth century tested surgical procedures on animals before performing them on human patients. An estimate of 60 million animals are used worldwide every year for testing, animals are used for three main reasons: to advance scientific understanding, to develop solutions for medical problems, and to protect the safety of the people, the animals, and the environment. Mammals are mainly used because they are very similarRead More Animal Testing and Researching Essay1035 Words   |  5 PagesAnimal Testing and Researching Animal testing is supported by some, but opposed to others. The growing number of animals used in research differs among the different countries. The fruit fly and nematode are the most used animal in testing. However, the most common mammals used in animal research are mice and rats. Shaved albino rabbits and guinea pigs suffer severe testing for skin irritancy and eye irritancy. Though the usage of non-human primates are outlawed in some countries, the U.S. stillRead MoreEssay about Stop Animal Testing1631 Words   |  7 Pagesof animals are used in scientific and medical research, including mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs and other animals. They are locked inside cold barren cages in laboratories across the country. Unfortunately all they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful procedures that will be performed on them. More than 100 million animals every year suffer and dies in cruel chemical, drug, food and cosmetic tests, and curiosity-driven medical experimentsRead MoreAnimal Testing: What if You Were in Their Place? Essay1621 Words   |  7 Pagesof the thousands of examples of profuse animal testing that has been going on for centuries. Mice, rats, dogs, pigs, cats, fish, birds and primates are tested every day by human beings in an attempt to learn more about the functions of our own bodies (Update: Animal Testing 2). The issue of animal testing has become an important topic of debate because despite the cruel and inhumane treatment of laboratory animals, people who support animal testing claim that the research benefits are phenomenalRead MoreThe Minute Speech Against Animal Testing1053 Words   |  5 PagesSpeech against animal testing We should stop the use of animals for research and testing purposes. Animal research/testing refers to the use of non-human animals for testing or experimenting on. The use of animals for testing is used in the fields of: Biomedical research, security, evaluation, and education of a product. Every year animals are subject to experiments so painful and damaging that no one would ever do them on humans. Deciding whether or not to do animal testing is a tough choice whichRead MoreEssay about The Truth about Animal Testing 1073 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Right now millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, puppies and other animals are locked inside cold, barren cages, in laboratories across the country. They ache in loneliness, and long to roam free and use their minds. Instead all they can do is wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful procedure that will be performed on them,† is the opening statement on the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or more commonly PETA, website. An estimated 29 million animals are used in scientificRead MoreHuman Tissue Toxicity Experimentation Will Allow For Eradication Of Animal Testing1480 Words   |  6 Pagesnewest technology advances in biomedical research. In vitro testing , microchips, and human tissue toxicity experimentation will allow for eradication of animal testing. The United States government permits the use of animals in laboratories for the use of research purposes. As of today the only law that protects animals in the United States is the Animal Welfare Act enacted in 1966. It regulates care and use of animals in research, testing, teaching, exhibition, transport, and by dealers. HoweverRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing1506 Words   |  7 Pages curiosity-driven testing, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal testing in America has lasted for many years. It has long been viewed as a way to find cures for human diseases and test the safety of consumer products. However, animal testing is very costly and wastes time compared to other options. Many test subjects even die due to experiments. Human anatomy is also very different from animals’, so test results are not always accurate. Animal product testing should not be performed

Family Law for Comparative Family Studies- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theFamily Law for Comparative Family Studies. Answer: Issue The issue in this case is to find out whether X can claim divorce from Y or not in accordance to the Women Charter 2009. Rule According to section 95 (1) of the Women Charter 2009 any of the parties involved in a marriage has the right to file a writ in relation to a divorce where the relationship of marriage between them has irretrievably broken down. According to section 95(2) of the WC, the court which hears the proceedings shall as far as it is reasonable to do so can, investigate into the situations which have been alleged as leading or causing the irretrievably breakdown of the marriage relationship. Where the court is satisfied upon investigation that it would be just and reasonable to dissolve the marriage based on such situation the court may pass an order of dissolution. The court in accordance to Subsection 3 would not hold that the marriage has broken down irretrievably and subsequently not provide a divorce unless a few specific situations laid down in the subsection have taken place. The defendant behaved in such a way that it cannot be reasonably expected from the plaintiff to stay with the defendant any further. In the case of Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline [2009] SGHC 244 divorce had been granted by the court on the basis of the provisions of section 95 that the marriage has broken down in irretrievably because the appellant had acted in such a way that his wife could not be reasonably expected to live with him any further. The appeal has been dismissed by the court. In this case the wife had made a complaint that the husband was not being loving and caring in the relationship and was also not treating the wife with respect. The wife had also made complaints in relation to violent outburst and unstable behavior of the husband (Quah, 2015). The defendant had deserted the plaintiff for a minimum period of two years immediately before the writ has been filed. The parties involved in the marriage had been apart for a period of three years continuously immediately before the writ has been filed and the defendant has consented to the grant of such judgment. The parties involved in the marriage had been apart for a period of four years continuously immediately before the writ has been filed. In the case of Ho Kiang Fah v Toh Buan Eileen [2009] SGHC 19 an appeal had been made against the decisions of the district court. The district court in the case had granted a divorce petition in favor of the respondent as the appellant had been living in separation from the respondent for more than a period of four years. The court of appeal rejected the appeal in favor of the respondent and held that she had sufficient grounds to claim divorce under section 95(3)(c) (Witte Hauk, 2017). According to subsection 4 the court may consider any circumstances which include the conduct of the parties as well as the interest of the children to the marriage if any in order to determine whether it would be reasonable and just to give a judgment. However if the court finds out that it would be unreasonable to dissolve the marriage under all circumstances the court would dismiss the application of the divorce. According to subsection 7 while taking into account the effects of subsection 3 whether the time which the parties to the marriage have lived apart no consideration shall be made in relation to any one period which is not more than six months or any two periods which is not more than six months in total in which the parties started to live with each other. However consideration would be made for any period in which the parties lived with each other. Application In the given situation it has been provided that X and Y have been married for a period of 7 years. Y as she want does not want to live with X until and unless X parts with his snake. As a result Y leaves the matrimonial house. X and Y lived separately for several months where X was only getting knowledge about Ys position from the mental hospital where Y had been a patient. However upon the discharge of Y she refused to go home with X due to the fact that the snake was still present with him. The couple has not been living together for a period of six and a half year. Here X has the right to make a claim in relation to the provisions of 95(c) (2) upon behavioral grounds. Here Y suffers from mental illness. Where the snake is not causing any harm it is reasonable for Y to cohabit with X. however a cross petition can be filed by Y in this case as she might claim keeping the snake is a behavioral misconduct. Y is causing significant hardship by X by not staying with him and not keeping any contact with him and thus a claim for divorce may be allowed as it was in the Ho Kiang Fah case. In addition X also has the right to claim for a divorce under section 95(3) (d) and 95 (3) (e) as Y has not been living with her since six and a half years. The separation of X and Y is physical. There is a element of mental separation as well as the parties are in no contact with each other apart for X providing financially for Ys care. Under section 95(4) it may be possible that the court would not grant the divorce taking into account the conduct of the parties and the effect of the dissolution of Y as she is not mentally stable. However the chances that X would be provided with a divorce are high as he has not given any consent for the separation. The court may also restrain to provide a divorce by considering the financial hardship for Y. however of the court is sure that the divorce is required it may allow it by proving some financial compensation to Y. Conclusion X is likely to be provided with a divorce under the provisions of the Women Charter 2009. Issue The issue in this case is to determine whether H can claim a divorce under the Women Charter 2009 Rules The court in accordance to Subsection 3 would not hold that the marriage has broken down irretrievably and subsequently not provide a divorce unless a few specific situations laid down in the subsection have taken place. The defendant behaved in such a way that it cannot be reasonably expected from the plaintiff to stay with the defendant any further. In the case of Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline [2009] SGHC 244 divorce had been granted by the court on the basis of the provisions of section 95 that the marriage has broken down in irretrievably because the appellant had acted in such a way that his wife could not be reasonably expected to live with him any further. The appeal has been dismissed by the court. In this case the wife had made a complaint that the husband was not being loving and caring in the relationship and was also not treating the wife with respect. The wife had also made complaints in relation to violent outburst and unstable behavior of the husband. The parties involved in the marriage had been apart for a period of three years continuously immediately before the writ has been filed and the defendant has consented to the grant of such judgment. The parties involved in the marriage had been apart for a period of four years continuously immediately before the writ has been filed. In the case of Ho Kiang Fah v Toh Buan Eileen [2009] SGHC 19 an appeal had been made against the decisions of the district court. The district court in the case had granted a divorce petition in favor of the respondent as the appellant had been living in separation from the respondent for more than a period of four years. The court of appeal rejected the appeal in favor of the respondent and held that she had sufficient grounds to claim divorce under section 95(3)(c) (Das, 2015). In JBB v JBA [2015] SGHCF 6 also the court ruled against the husband where the wife had made a complaint against him that she can reasonably stay with him any longer because of his behavior. In this case upon the implementation of the objective test it had been determined by the court that it was really unreasonable for the wife to stay with the husband on behavioral grounds and therefore the court provided the judgment in favor of the wife and dismissed the appeal with cost (Statsky, 2014). According to subsection 4 the court may consider any circumstances which include the conduct of the parties as well as the interest of the children to the marriage if any in order to determine whether it would be reasonable and just to give a judgment. However if the court finds out that it would be unreasonable to dissolve the marriage under all circumstances the court would dismiss the application of the divorce. Application In the given situation it has been provided that H and W have been married for a period of 30 years. Differences are growing between parties to the marriage and it is getting difficult for them to live together. This is because the wife W has been lately taking interest in womens rights and radical politics. H the husband is being embarrassed because he is receiving several taunts form his friends about his wife going out of control. W has also provided H that she is not going to do the household work by claiming she is not a slave. W is also not participating with H socially and making fun of his social engagements. W had also made H wait on the doorstep for more than two hours intentionally until she provided him keys to the house. Therefore H wants a divorce for from Y. In the given situation H has the right to make a claim of divorce against W based on the provisions of section 95 where the marriage irretrievably broken down. This claim can specifically be made under section 95(3 ) (b) in relation to behavioral grounds. According to the objective test of reasonable co-habilitation as provided in the JBA case if a reasonable person is put in the position of H it would not be possible him to reasonably continue living with Y because of her behavior. This is because W is not respecting any values which H has and reasonably making his life difficult. Additionally W is intentionally causing difficulties to H in relation to their living together. The only reason why W does not want a divorce in the given situation is that Ws mother C has provided that any of her children who take a divorce would be removed from any right of inheritance. W gas no other affection or reason to continue to live with Y However in the given situation it would be difficult for H to take support of the provisions which have been provided in Section 95 (3)(d) and 95 (3)(e) related to three and four years of desertion respectively as there is little evidence to establish actual desertion due to the withdrawal not being complete. Possibly the court may have also not provided divorce under the provisions of section 95(4) of the WC as it may be considered that W may be subjected to hardship following the divorce. However in the given situation it is really not possible for H to continue living with W because of her behavior. She is not financially unstable and also they do not have any children who may be affected due to the divorce. Conclusion Therefore in the given situation H has the right to seek divorcer from W on behavioral ground. References Das, M. (2015). Singapore's Women's Charter: Revolution or Evolution?. InOur Lives to Live: Putting a Woman's Face to Change in Singapore(pp. 159-166). Ho Kiang Fah v Toh Buan Eileen [2009] SGHC 19 JBB v JBA [2015] SGHCF 6 Ong, D. S. (2015). Divorce, the family court and family lawyering.Routledge Handbook of Families in Asia, 411. Quah, S. E. L. (2015). Negotiating Family and Divorce in Singapore. In Perspectives on Marital Dissolution (pp. 35-50). Springer Singapore. Statsky, W. (2014).Family law: The essentials. Nelson Education. Sun, S.H.L., Ee Chong, W. and Lim, S.H., 2014. Gender and divorce in contemporary Singapore.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, pp.127-143. Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline [2009] SGHC 244 Witte Jr, J., Hauk, G. S. (Eds.). (2017).Christianity and Family Law: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. Women Charter 2009