Working Manufacturing Company In Alberta †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Working Manufacturing Company In Alberta? Answer: Introducation The following case study is based on the accident faced a certain worker while working in the manufacturing company in Alberta. This assignment is mainly based on the perspectives and the outlook pertaining to the human resource professional thereby designing the entire procedure through the formulation of steps executed to manage the situation concerning the accident thus keeping the employees workload and how that can be shared. accounting 24, 25 and 42 of the Workers Compensation Act of Alberta are considered to be relevant to this particular situation. Explanation of the purpose of the relevant act According to Tucker, (2003) section 24 addresses the eligibility criteria for deriving compensation. It is stated that a certain worker might be compensated on the grounds that he/ she has faced a sudden personal accident or injury unless the worker bears any attribution relating to misconduct to it. This section also states that the dependents of the worker are exposed to compensation in case of the workers death. Thus in this light, the board is held responsible for the payment of the compensation. Moreover according to the act, it is anticipated that any sort of personal injury or accident and death occurred during the employment is looked upon as a result of employment unless and until the contrary is represented (Island, 2006). The seventh part of section 24 also states that disablement or any probable disablement endured y the worker through the occurrence of any sort of occupational disease, the date that the disablement happened is adjudged or rated in the case of disablement and Probable disablement respectively mentioned Seland et al., (2006). Section 25 addresses that in case a worker is disabled for a particular period of a day of the accident or for the entire day then the employer is liable to offer compensation for that specific day on the next planed pay period amounting to the workers net wage for that period in case if the worker was not exposed to the sudden injury or accident. On the contrary, it states that the board is liable to offer only medical assistance and not any other sort of compensation stated Tucker, (2003). The second part of the section 25 states that if the worker gets disabled for more than a day then the employer s liable to compensate for the day while keeping at par with the board that will compensate for each day starting from the day of accident thus excluding only the days on which the worker would not have worked if he/ she was in normal form. Pertaining to all these clauses under section 25, it is mandatory that the worker produces a physicians report that displays the cause of the worker s absence was due to the injury or accident caused at the management site (Animashaun Odeku, 2014). Island, (2006) expressed that section 42 displays the requirement for the application concerning compensation that shall be acknowledged by the Board through the employment of adjudicator. Therefore concerning the case scenario, it might be drawn that sub parts 2, 4 and 7 of section 24, sub parts 1, 2 and 3 of section 25 as well as section 42 are applicable (Tucker, 2003). Employees and employers duties during accident occurrences According to the Occupational Health and Safety Act of Alberta which got passed during 2000, it is stated that the employers are liable to safeguard and look after the occupational health and safety concerning the workers who are involved in working the respective employer (Seland et al., (2006). those labourers not occupied with work concerning that employer, however, exposed to the work area where that work has been conducted, as well as that the labourers occupied with work in regards to the same employer are mindful of their obligations as well as duties abided by this specific Act, the mandates and the received code. During the case of accident, the prime contractor/ contractor/ employer must report regarding the time, place as well as nature of accident to the Director of Inspection as early as possible. Furthermore the employer is liable to conduct an investigation, construct a report concerning the circumstances and the action taken so that recurrence might be prohibited. As an employee, it becomes crucial to report any injury or accident mentioned Dollar Bakker, (2010). Reference to relevant Act and the relevant steps Besides, the Occupational Health and Safety Act of Alberta, there is another act which is the emergency medical aid act of Alberta which states that protection from any injury or accident will be provided through a registered nurse or a physician by the application f voluntary services and emergency medical aid (Tucker, 2003). Steps incorporated are as follows: Looking after the person injured Prevention of more injuries to occur Safeguarding the so called endangered property which is an outcome of the accident To distribute the workload of the injured, a risk assessment planning might be done through organizational as well as individual interventions thereby allowing the skilled workers to work for the respective job thus adding certain incentives into it (Krueger, 1990). Return to Work program for the employee Training interventions might be provided to the employee who has broken his/ her arm for a new job role where the worker might be fitted in. Compensations must be provided. Framing an action plan for the injured employee, incorporation of physical demands analysis and others might also be initiated (Dollard Bakker, 2010). Direct and indirect costs Indirect costs are considered to be four times more than the direct cost incurred due to accidents in workplace. There are certain direct costs like medical aid while the indirect costs are the investigation cost, delays in scheduling the work, training interventions for the injured and the other workers in shock, legal expenses, expenses arising from replaced tools and workers mentioned Krueger, (1990). References Animashaun, O., Odeku, K. O. (2014). Industrial accident and safety hazards at the workplace: A spatio-physical workplace approach.Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,5(20), 2949. Dollard, M. F., Bakker, A. B. (2010). psychology safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,83(3), 579-599. Island, B. (2006). Northwest Territories.Current Research, Part E. Geological Survey of. Krueger, A. B. (1990). Incentive effects of workers' compensation insurance.Journal of Public Economics,41(1), 73-99. Seland, K., Cherry, N., Beach, J. (2006). A study of factors influencing return to work after wrist or ankle fractures.American journal of industrial medicine,49(3), 197-203. Tucker, E. (2003). Diverging trends in worker healthcare and safety protection and participation in Canada, 1985-2000.Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations,58(3), 395-426.